Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBFX
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$28.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.10
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.73B
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PGPCX (2.31B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBFX (2.00) vs PGPCX (0.91). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. PGPCX (8.58). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.45 vs. PGPCX (29.85).
| PGPCX | RLBFX | PGPCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.389 | 14.948 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 2.00 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.58 | 9.94 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.39 | 52.76 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.85 | 45.45 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.93 | 80.43 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement