Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBFX
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$26.52
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.93
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.37B
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. PGPCX (2.2B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBFX (2.10) vs PGPCX (1.01). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. PGPCX (5.63). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.71 vs. PGPCX (26.90).
| PGPCX | RLBFX | PGPCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.217 | 8.281 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 2.10 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 7.38 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.59 | 37.11 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.90 | 40.71 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.92 | 65.29 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement