Ad is loading...
PGPCX vs RLBFX
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$25.56
Change+$0.17 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.16B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.06
Change+$0.22 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.18B
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 240B vs. PGPCX (2.16B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBFX (2.50) vs PGPCX (0.45). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. PGPCX (47.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). PGPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.29 vs. RLBFX (12.61). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.46 vs. PGPCX (24.13).
| PGPCX | RLBFX | PGPCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.268 | 1.948 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.16B | 240B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 2.50 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.29 | 12.61 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.18 | 13.10 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.13 | 31.46 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.71 | 58.66 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...