Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPCX vs RLBFX
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$26.89
Change+$0.13 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.24
Change+$0.12 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.84B
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. PGPCX (2.23B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBFX (2.08) vs PGPCX (1.09). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PGPCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). PGPCX (10.65) and RLBFX (10.48) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.77 vs. PGPCX (25.59).
| PGPCX | RLBFX | PGPCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.821 | 9.101 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 2.08 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.65 | 10.48 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.72 | 32.76 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.59 | 38.77 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.13 | 68.01 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement