Ad is loading...
PGPCX vs RLBFX
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPCX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced C
Price$25.60
Change-$0.27 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.39
Change-$0.35 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets242.17B
PGPCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 242B vs. PGPCX (2.15B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: RLBFX (2.50) vs PGPCX (0.45). PGPCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPCX (26 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. PGPCX (47.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). PGPCX (9.81) and RLBFX (9.54) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.70 vs. PGPCX (23.33).
| PGPCX | RLBFX | PGPCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.426 | 2.908 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 242B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 2.50 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.81 | 9.54 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.54 | 18.32 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.33 | 31.70 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.47 | 55.11 | 104% |