Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBCX
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$25.70
Change-$0.09 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$35.51
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.73B
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PGPRX (2.13B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBCX (1.63) vs PGPRX (1.42). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPRX (22 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.62 vs. PGPRX (5.39). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.84 vs. PGPRX (28.34).
| PGPRX | RLBCX | PGPRX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.600 | 4.466 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.63 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.39 | 6.62 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.23 | 22.09 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.34 | 32.84 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.00 | 56.35 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement