Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBCX
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$27.13
Change+$0.13 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.91
Change+$0.12 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.84B
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. PGPRX (2.23B). PGPRX (1.57) and RLBCX (1.56) have matching dividends . PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBCX (250). PGPRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.21 vs. RLBCX (9.77). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.23 vs. PGPRX (28.92).
| PGPRX | RLBCX | PGPRX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.131 | 8.712 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.56 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.21 | 9.77 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.76 | 30.66 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.92 | 35.23 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.35 | 61.95 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement