Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBCX
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$27.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.32
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.26B
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. PGPRX (2.27B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBCX (1.53) vs PGPRX (1.31). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. PGPRX (9.39). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.27 vs. PGPRX (33.13).
| PGPRX | RLBCX | PGPRX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.092 | 12.865 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 262B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.53 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.39 | 9.94 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.04 | 40.98 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.13 | 41.27 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.39 | 74.56 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement