Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBCX
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBCX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$28.03
Change-$0.16 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.43
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
PGPRX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. PGPRX (2.28B). PGPRX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PGPRX (1.58) vs RLBCX (1.46). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. PGPRX (7.74). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.24 vs. PGPRX (28.21).
| PGPRX | RLBCX | PGPRX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.072 | 13.420 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 264B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | 8.46 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.25 | 39.37 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.21 | 36.24 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.21 | 67.41 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement