Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBEX
PGPRX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBEX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$26.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$36.45
Change+$0.10 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.05B
PGPRX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 250B vs. PGPRX (2.18B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBEX (1.90) vs PGPRX (1.42). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PGPRX (22 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. PGPRX (6.61). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.01 vs. PGPRX (35.50).
| PGPRX | RLBEX | PGPRX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.59 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.59 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.397 | 7.007 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 250B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.90 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.61 | 7.61 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.20 | 34.11 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.50 | 43.01 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.58 | 66.14 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement