Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBEX
PGPRX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBEX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$28.03
Change-$0.16 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.63
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
PGPRX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. PGPRX (2.28B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBEX (1.71) vs PGPRX (1.58). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. PGPRX (7.74). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.00 vs. PGPRX (28.21).
| PGPRX | RLBEX | PGPRX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.59 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.59 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.072 | 13.718 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 264B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.71 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | 8.82 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.25 | 40.62 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.21 | 38.00 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.21 | 72.83 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement