Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBFX
PGPRX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$28.19
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.97
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.18B
PGPRX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. PGPRX (2.31B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBFX (2.00) vs PGPRX (1.27). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.47 vs. PGPRX (7.73). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.59 vs. PGPRX (31.13).
| PGPRX | RLBFX | PGPRX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.316 | 14.566 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 265B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.00 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 8.47 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.35 | 54.58 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.13 | 43.59 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.85 | 78.22 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers