Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGPRX vs RLBFX
PGPRX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PGPRX vs RLBFX
George Putnam Balanced R
Price$28.09
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
PGPRX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGPRX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGPRX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PGPRX (2.27B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PGPRX: RLBFX (1.97) vs PGPRX (1.58). PGPRX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PGPRX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PGPRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PGPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PGPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PGPRX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. PGPRX (7.52). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. PGPRX (28.82).
| PGPRX | RLBFX | PGPRX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.310 | 14.331 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.97 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.52 | 9.32 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.56 | 42.18 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.82 | 40.53 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.61 | 74.39 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers