PGUCY vs RYSKF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGUCY is a Hold and RYSKF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PGUCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRYSKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PGUCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RYSKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
PGUCY (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RYSKF (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.81%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Air Freight/Couriers (-1.26% weekly)The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
| PGUCY | RYSKF | PGUCY / RYSKF | |
| Capitalization | 1.01B | 529M | 192% |
| EBITDA | 333M | 1.29B | 26% |
| Gain YTD | 13.397 | 45.813 | 29% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.01 | 42.19 | 24% |
| Revenue | 1.97B | 2.41B | 82% |
| Total Cash | 277M | 518M | 53% |
| Total Debt | 983M | 2.65B | 37% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
PGUCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGUCY and ROYMY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGUCY and ROYMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGUCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGUCY | 100% | N/A | ||
| ROYMY - PGUCY | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| GXO - PGUCY | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| SPSTY - PGUCY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JDLGF - PGUCY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SPSTF - PGUCY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RYSKF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RYSKF and GXO have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RYSKF and GXO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RYSKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYSKF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GXO - RYSKF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| ROYMY - RYSKF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| ROYMF - RYSKF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JDLGF - RYSKF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PGUCY - RYSKF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||