Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGAEX
PGWCX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGAEX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$37.57
Change+$0.26 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R4
Price$87.18
Change+$0.62 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
PGWCX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGAEX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PGWCX (1.76B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: RGAEX (0.31) vs PGWCX (0.00). PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGAEX (23 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.64). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGAEX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.83 vs. PGWCX (10.91). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 45.58 vs. PGWCX (-6.89).
| PGWCX | RGAEX | PGWCX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.64 | 269% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.64 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.190 | 17.737 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.91 | 16.83 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.43 | 61.96 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.89 | 45.58 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.71 | 102.89 | 20% |