Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGAFX
PGWCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGAFX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$38.36
Change+$0.20 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$89.40
Change+$0.66 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
PGWCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. PGWCX (1.81B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: RGAFX (0.53) vs PGWCX (0.00). PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGAFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.14 vs. PGWCX (10.03). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.91 vs. PGWCX (-8.99).
| PGWCX | RGAFX | PGWCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.34 | 506% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.34 | 506% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.814 | 20.129 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 15.14 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.50 | 77.28 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.99 | 43.91 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.50 | 108.02 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement