Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGAFX
PGWCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGAFX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$38.82
Change+$0.12 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$89.37
Change+$0.57 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.93B
PGWCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PGWCX (1.82B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: RGAFX (0.52) vs PGWCX (0.00). PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (20.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGAFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. PGWCX (6.09). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.83 vs. PGWCX (-9.90).
| PGWCX | RGAFX | PGWCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.34 | 506% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.34 | 506% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.481 | 20.089 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.09 | 9.60 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.25 | 70.29 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.90 | 35.83 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.49 | 96.75 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement