Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGEBX
PGWCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGEBX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$33.20
Change-$0.51 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
PGWCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. PGWCX (1.53B). PGWCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: PGWCX (41 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGEBX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.47 vs. PGWCX (-1.19). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. PGWCX (0.97).
| PGWCX | RGEBX | PGWCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.09 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.09 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.501 | 4.829 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 306B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.19 | 6.47 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.77 | 51.01 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.97 | 45.42 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.57 | 65.87 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement