Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGEBX
PGWCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGEBX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$38.36
Change+$0.20 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$85.34
Change+$0.64 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
PGWCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. PGWCX (1.81B). PGWCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGEBX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.95 vs. PGWCX (10.03). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.76 vs. PGWCX (-8.99).
| PGWCX | RGEBX | PGWCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.09 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.09 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.814 | 19.457 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 13.95 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.50 | 73.31 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.99 | 38.76 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.50 | 96.71 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement