Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGEBX
PGWCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGEBX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$37.57
Change+$0.26 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.45
Change+$0.59 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
PGWCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PGWCX (1.76B). PGWCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGEBX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.07 vs. PGWCX (10.91). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.08 vs. PGWCX (-6.89).
| PGWCX | RGEBX | PGWCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.09 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.09 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.190 | 17.385 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.91 | 16.07 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.43 | 59.47 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.89 | 42.08 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.71 | 94.78 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement