Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGEBX
PGWCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGEBX
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$36.61
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.71B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
PGWCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. PGWCX (1.71B). PGWCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGEBX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. PGWCX (9.56). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.64 vs. PGWCX (-4.75).
| PGWCX | RGEBX | PGWCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.09 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.09 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.276 | 13.942 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.56 | 13.85 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.67 | 40.38 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.75 | 40.64 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.10 | 79.50 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement