PGZ | SCHH | PGZ / SCHH | |
Gain YTD | 9.921 | 4.843 | 205% |
Net Assets | 79M | 7.71B | 1% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 37.00 | 6.00 | 617% |
Yield | 4.74 | 3.24 | 146% |
Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
PGZ | SCHH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago89% | 4 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 28 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGZ and DLR have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGZ and DLR's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHH has been closely correlated with PLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHH jumps, then PLD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH | 100% | +0.73% | ||
PLD - SCHH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
ARE - SCHH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
CUBE - SCHH | 83% Closely correlated | -2.94% | ||
PSA - SCHH | 81% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
KIM - SCHH | 80% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
More |