| PGZ | SCHH | PGZ / SCHH | |
| Gain YTD | 14.034 | 1.601 | 877% |
| Net Assets | 75.6M | 8.32B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.62 | 0.07 | 3,743% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 8.00 | 363% |
| Yield | 6.49 | 3.11 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| PGZ | SCHH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 15 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGZ and DLR have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGZ and DLR's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHH has been closely correlated with EQR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHH jumps, then EQR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHH | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| EQR - SCHH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| STAG - SCHH | 84% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| UDR - SCHH | 84% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| AVB - SCHH | 83% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| FR - SCHH | 82% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
More | ||||