PGZFF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.02 (+22.22%)
Updated
Mar 5 closing price
Capitalization
54.49M
PMMCF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.08M
Ad is loading...

PGZFF vs PMMCF

Header iconPGZFF vs PMMCF Comparison
Open Charts PGZFF vs PMMCFBanner chart's image
Pan Global Resource
Price$0.11
Change+$0.02 (+22.22%)
Volume$11.45K
Capitalization54.49M
Pampa Metals
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization1.08M
PGZFF vs PMMCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PGZFF vs. PMMCF commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGZFF is a Hold and PMMCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (PGZFF: $0.11 vs. PMMCF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: PGZFF and PMMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PGZFF: 30% vs. PMMCF: 9%
Market capitalization -- PGZFF: $54.49M vs. PMMCF: $1.08M
PGZFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $54.49M. PMMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PGZFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PGZFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PGZFF and PMMCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

PGZFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +18.44% price change this week, while PMMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +10.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.73% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGZFF($54.5M) has a higher market cap than PMMCF($1.08M). PGZFF YTD gains are higher at: 48.822 vs. PMMCF (9.091). PMMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -143.65K vs. PGZFF (-11.57M). PGZFF has more cash in the bank: 6.09M vs. PMMCF (3.48M). PGZFF (0) and PMMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PGZFFPMMCFPGZFF / PMMCF
Capitalization54.5M1.08M5,065%
EBITDA-11.57M-143.65K8,054%
Gain YTD48.8229.091537%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.09M3.48M175%
Total DebtN/A10.6K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGZFF: Fundamental Ratings
PGZFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PALI0.850.01
+1.30%
Palisade Bio
INFA18.530.23
+1.26%
Informatica
HBNC15.97-0.15
-0.93%
Horizon Bancorp
LGO1.75-0.03
-1.96%
Largo
TNDM17.96-0.76
-4.06%
Tandem Diabetes Care

PGZFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGZFF and SGPTF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGZFF and SGPTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGZFF
1D Price
Change %
PGZFF100%
N/A
SGPTF - PGZFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+33.33%
ALMTF - PGZFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.96%
KVLQF - PGZFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+11.78%
NVLHF - PGZFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-14.47%
PMMCF - PGZFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
More

PMMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMMCF and PGZFF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMMCF and PGZFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMMCF
1D Price
Change %
PMMCF100%
+9.09%
PGZFF - PMMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAMMF - PMMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUIFF - PMMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EEMMF - PMMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
FNICF - PMMCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+14.89%
More