PH
Price
$654.09
Change
-$12.77 (-1.91%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
71.37B
46 days until earnings call
SCWO
Price
$0.36
Change
-$0.05 (-12.20%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
167.16M
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PH vs SCWO

Header iconPH vs SCWO Comparison
Open Charts PH vs SCWOBanner chart's image
Parker-Hannifin
Price$654.09
Change-$12.77 (-1.91%)
Volume$682.78K
Capitalization71.37B
374Water
Price$0.36
Change-$0.05 (-12.20%)
Volume$290.58K
Capitalization167.16M
PH vs SCWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
PH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PH vs. SCWO commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PH is a Buy and SCWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (PH: $654.09 vs. SCWO: $0.36)
Brand notoriety: PH and SCWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PH: 97% vs. SCWO: 54%
Market capitalization -- PH: $71.37B vs. SCWO: $167.16M
PH [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $71.37B. SCWO’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $167.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PH is a better buy in the long-term than SCWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCWO is a better buy in the short-term than PH.

Price Growth

PH (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while SCWO (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -9.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

PH is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

SCWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-1.30% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PH($71.4B) has a higher market cap than SCWO($167M). PH YTD gains are higher at: 3.373 vs. SCWO (-47.231). PH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.82B vs. SCWO (-7M). PH has more cash in the bank: 394M vs. SCWO (12.8M). SCWO has less debt than PH: SCWO (478K) vs PH (11.8B). PH has higher revenues than SCWO: PH (19.8B) vs SCWO (1.65M).
PHSCWOPH / SCWO
Capitalization71.4B167M42,754%
EBITDA4.82B-7M-68,865%
Gain YTD3.373-47.231-7%
P/E Ratio27.22N/A-
Revenue19.8B1.65M1,197,822%
Total Cash394M12.8M3,078%
Total Debt11.8B478K2,468,619%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PH vs SCWO: Fundamental Ratings
PH
SCWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7295
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1196
SMR RATING
1..100
3595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCWO's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as PH (84) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that SCWO’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.

PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCWO (96) in the null industry. This means that PH’s stock grew significantly faster than SCWO’s over the last 12 months.

PH's SMR Rating (35) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCWO (95) in the null industry. This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCWO’s over the last 12 months.

PH's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as SCWO (63) in the null industry. This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to SCWO’s over the last 12 months.

PH's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCWO (100) in the null industry. This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHSCWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMFPX10.470.02
+0.19%
Westwood Salient MLP & Engy Infras C
FEYTX27.33-0.32
-1.16%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% M
HSMBX35.66-0.49
-1.36%
Horizon Multi-Factor Small/Mid Cap Adv
RYSVX187.64-2.97
-1.56%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value A
TMCAX11.65-0.19
-1.60%
RBC SMID Cap Growth A

PH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PH has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PH jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PH
1D Price
Change %
PH100%
-1.91%
ITT - PH
85%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
DOV - PH
84%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
EMR - PH
81%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
FLS - PH
79%
Closely correlated
-2.68%
IR - PH
78%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
More

SCWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCWO has been loosely correlated with NDSN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCWO jumps, then NDSN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCWO
1D Price
Change %
SCWO100%
-11.65%
NDSN - SCWO
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
ITT - SCWO
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
ROK - SCWO
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
PH - SCWO
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
GGG - SCWO
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
More