PIAIF vs PNGAY
To understand the difference between Ping AN Insurance (Group) Co. of China, Ltd. - Ordinary Shares - Class H (PIAIF) vs. Ping AN Insurance (Group) Co. of China, Ltd. - ADR - Level I (PNGAY) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class H and ADR - Level I
Ordinary Shares - Class H - The Chinese stock markets have strict restrictions on who can buy and what is available to investors for purchase. Chinese H-shares represent the shares of publicly-traded incorporated Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and trade with a face value of Hong Kong dollars (HKD). Before 2007, H-shares were provided only for foreign investors. Since foreign investors trade H-shares, they have become more liquid in comparison to A-shares which represent publicly listed Chinese companies that trade on the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges in yuan renminbi (CNY). Thus, this resulted in A-shares being traded at a premium to H-shares of a similar company.
ADR - Level I - ADR Level I requires the least amount of compliance and regulatory oversight, and investments are originated by the foreign company wishing to offer shares. Although ADRs Level I are riskier for investors than other types of ADRs, they are inexpensive way for a foreign company to gauge the level of U.S. investor interest in its securities. Because of the minimal oversight and exemption from reporting requirements, ADRs Level I are only traded on the over-the-counter (OTC) market.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PIAIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNGAY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PIAIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PNGAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PIAIF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNGAY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PIAIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- PNGAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
PIAIF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -6.61% price change this week, while PNGAY (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
PNGAY is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (-2.84% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| PIAIF | PNGAY | PIAIF / PNGAY | |
| Capitalization | 133B | 133B | 100% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.556 | 40.192 | 64% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.17 | 9.16 | 100% |
| Revenue | 1.04T | 1.04T | 100% |
| Total Cash | 794B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.35T | N/A | - |
PIAIF | PNGAY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 11 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PIAIF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as PNGAY (11). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew similarly to PNGAY’s over the last 12 months.
PIAIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PNGAY (100). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew similarly to PNGAY’s over the last 12 months.
PIAIF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PNGAY (100). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew similarly to PNGAY’s over the last 12 months.
PIAIF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PNGAY (42). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew similarly to PNGAY’s over the last 12 months.
PNGAY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as PIAIF (63). This means that PNGAY’s stock grew similarly to PIAIF’s over the last 12 months.
| PIAIF | PNGAY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 74% |
PIAIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIAIF has been loosely correlated with PNGAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIAIF jumps, then PNGAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PIAIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIAIF | 100% | -4.56% | ||
| PNGAY - PIAIF | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| AAIGF - PIAIF | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
| AAGIY - PIAIF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CILJF - PIAIF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
| PUKPF - PIAIF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PNGAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNGAY has been closely correlated with AAGIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNGAY jumps, then AAGIY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNGAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNGAY | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| AAGIY - PNGAY | 73% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| PUK - PNGAY | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| CILJF - PNGAY | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| AAIGF - PNGAY | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| PIAIF - PNGAY | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.56% | ||
More | ||||