PIFMY
Price
$23.25
Change
+$0.51 (+2.24%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
RSGUF
Price
$4.66
Change
+$0.02 (+0.43%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
592.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PIFMY vs RSGUF

Header iconPIFMY vs RSGUF Comparison
Open Charts PIFMY vs RSGUFBanner chart's image
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur TBK
Price$23.25
Change+$0.51 (+2.24%)
Volume$307
Capitalization4.01B
Rogers Sugar
Price$4.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization592.54M
PIFMY vs RSGUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PIFMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PIFMY vs. RSGUF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIFMY is a Hold and RSGUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PIFMY: $23.25 vs. RSGUF: $4.66)
Brand notoriety: PIFMY and RSGUF are both not notable
PIFMY represents the Food: Major Diversified, while RSGUF is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PIFMY: 49% vs. RSGUF: 2%
Market capitalization -- PIFMY: $4.01B vs. RSGUF: $592.54M
PIFMY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.01B. RSGUF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $592.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $79.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PIFMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRSGUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PIFMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RSGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSGUF is a better buy in the long-term than PIFMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PIFMY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSGUF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PIFMY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RSGUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSGUF is a better buy in the short-term than PIFMY.

Price Growth

PIFMY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.96% price change this week, while RSGUF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.63%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.34% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIFMY($4.01B) has a higher market cap than RSGUF($593M). RSGUF has higher P/E ratio than PIFMY: RSGUF (13.06) vs PIFMY (6.33). RSGUF YTD gains are higher at: 13.936 vs. PIFMY (1.687). PIFMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.21T vs. RSGUF (145M). PIFMY has more cash in the bank: 51.84T vs. RSGUF (26.6M). RSGUF has less debt than PIFMY: RSGUF (381M) vs PIFMY (71.29T). PIFMY has higher revenues than RSGUF: PIFMY (118.33T) vs RSGUF (1.3B).
PIFMYRSGUFPIFMY / RSGUF
Capitalization4.01B593M676%
EBITDA24.21T145M16,699,310%
Gain YTD1.68713.93612%
P/E Ratio6.3313.0648%
Revenue118.33T1.3B9,130,633%
Total Cash51.84T26.6M194,883,459%
Total Debt71.29T381M18,712,073%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PIFMY vs RSGUF: Fundamental Ratings
PIFMY
RSGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8291
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5862
SMR RATING
1..100
1151
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8565
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a3

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSGUF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFMY (19). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

PIFMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as RSGUF (62). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew similarly to RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFMY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSGUF (51). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFMY (61). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFMY (85). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PIFMYRSGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PIFMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFGEX10.860.06
+0.56%
DFA Global Real Estate Securities Port
ERBIX19.86N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Equity Strategy I
IASTX24.32N/A
N/A
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl R6
CADVX20.73N/A
N/A
Calamos Dividend Growth A
USERX21.73-0.26
-1.18%
US Global Investors Gld & Prec Mtls

PIFMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIFMY and PAVS have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIFMY and PAVS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIFMY
1D Price
Change %
PIFMY100%
+2.24%
PAVS - PIFMY
24%
Poorly correlated
+27.92%
SUEZY - PIFMY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFODF - PIFMY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSGUF - PIFMY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
SAPIF - PIFMY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More

RSGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSGUF and LW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSGUF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSGUF
1D Price
Change %
RSGUF100%
+0.51%
LW - RSGUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
DAR - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
CIADY - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
SAPIF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
PRBZF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More