PIFYF
Price
$0.57
Change
-$0.01 (-1.72%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
ZPTAF
Price
$3.69
Change
-$0.05 (-1.34%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

PIFYF vs ZPTAF

Header iconPIFYF vs ZPTAF Comparison
Open Charts PIFYF vs ZPTAFBanner chart's image
Pine Cliff Energy
Price$0.57
Change-$0.01 (-1.72%)
Volume$20.42K
CapitalizationN/A
Surge Energy
Price$3.69
Change-$0.05 (-1.34%)
Volume$41.13K
CapitalizationN/A
PIFYF vs ZPTAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PIFYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZPTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PIFYF vs. ZPTAF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIFYF is a StrongSell and ZPTAF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (PIFYF: $0.57 vs. ZPTAF: $3.69)
Brand notoriety: PIFYF and ZPTAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PIFYF: 29% vs. ZPTAF: 137%
Market capitalization -- PIFYF: $411.53M vs. ZPTAF: $614.24M
PIFYF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $411.53M. ZPTAF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $614.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PIFYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZPTAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PIFYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZPTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIFYF is a better buy in the long-term than ZPTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PIFYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZPTAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PIFYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZPTAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PIFYF and ZPTAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PIFYF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -6.95% price change this week, while ZPTAF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +46.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+46.66% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZPTAF($614M) has a higher market cap than PIFYF($412M). PIFYF has higher P/E ratio than ZPTAF: PIFYF (5.67) vs ZPTAF (2.68). ZPTAF YTD gains are higher at: -24.847 vs. PIFYF (-44.223). ZPTAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 385M vs. PIFYF (154M). PIFYF has more cash in the bank: 62M vs. ZPTAF (1.87M). PIFYF has less debt than ZPTAF: PIFYF (3.83M) vs ZPTAF (338M). ZPTAF has higher revenues than PIFYF: ZPTAF (728M) vs PIFYF (297M).
PIFYFZPTAFPIFYF / ZPTAF
Capitalization412M614M67%
EBITDA154M385M40%
Gain YTD-44.223-24.847178%
P/E Ratio5.672.68212%
Revenue297M728M41%
Total Cash62M1.87M3,317%
Total Debt3.83M338M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PIFYF vs ZPTAF: Fundamental Ratings
PIFYF
ZPTAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7161
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58100
SMR RATING
1..100
9447
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6481
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
591
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZPTAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFYF (35). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to PIFYF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZPTAF (100). This means that PIFYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPTAF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFYF (94). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFYF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFYF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (81). This means that PIFYF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFYF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZPTAF (91). This means that PIFYF’s stock grew significantly faster than ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PIFYFZPTAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PIFYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZPTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTEL38.398.49
+28.39%
Fitell Corp
CURV4.540.27
+6.32%
Torrid Holdings
PSMMY31.360.17
+0.54%
Persimmon Plc
SUHJY9.57-0.03
-0.31%
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
AAVMY15.10-0.12
-0.77%
Abn Amro BK N V

PIFYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIFYF has been loosely correlated with KOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIFYF jumps, then KOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIFYF
1D Price
Change %
PIFYF100%
-0.84%
KOS - PIFYF
40%
Loosely correlated
+19.19%
ZPTAF - PIFYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
IPOOF - PIFYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
SPGYF - PIFYF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
VET - PIFYF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
More

ZPTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZPTAF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZPTAF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZPTAF
1D Price
Change %
ZPTAF100%
-1.34%
BTE - ZPTAF
81%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
VRN - ZPTAF
79%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
TNEYF - ZPTAF
79%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
VET - ZPTAF
77%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
OBE - ZPTAF
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
More