Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIIMX vs RNWAX
PIIMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts PIIMX vs RNWAX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
Price$30.72
Change+$0.19 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.04B
American Funds New World R1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
PIIMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIIMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIIMX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. PIIMX (3.05B). PIIMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: PIIMX (0.29) vs RNWAX (0.00). PIIMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: PIIMX (9 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PIIMX (1.08). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PIIMX (28.50). PIIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: PIIMX (0) vs RNWAX (250). PIIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. RNWAX (10.52). PIIMX return over 5 years is better than : 34.65 vs. RNWAX (27.55).
| PIIMX | RNWAX | PIIMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.66 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.66 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.440 | 15.958 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.05B | 70.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.70 | 10.52 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.84 | 37.18 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.65 | 27.55 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement