Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIIMX vs RNWBX
PIIMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PIIMX vs RNWBX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
Price$33.93
Change+$0.37 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.07B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.18
Change+$0.57 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
PIIMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIIMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIIMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. PIIMX (4.07B). PIIMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PIIMX (0.27) vs RNWBX (0.13). PIIMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PIIMX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PIIMX (1.08). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PIIMX (28.50). PIIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: PIIMX (0) vs RNWBX (250). PIIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.36 vs. RNWBX (16.11). PIIMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.60 vs. RNWBX (25.99).
| PIIMX | RNWBX | PIIMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.67 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.482 | 22.610 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.07B | 74.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.13 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.36 | 16.11 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.07 | 46.85 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.60 | 25.99 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement