Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIIMX vs RNWBX
PIIMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PIIMX vs RNWBX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
Price$30.72
Change+$0.19 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.04B
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
PIIMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIIMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIIMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. PIIMX (3.05B). PIIMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PIIMX (0.29) vs RNWBX (0.13). PIIMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PIIMX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PIIMX (1.08). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PIIMX (28.50). PIIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: PIIMX (0) vs RNWBX (250). PIIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. RNWBX (10.50). PIIMX return over 5 years is better than : 34.65 vs. RNWBX (27.64).
| PIIMX | RNWBX | PIIMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.67 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.440 | 15.935 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.05B | 70.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.13 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.70 | 10.50 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.84 | 37.23 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.65 | 27.64 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.65 | - |