Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIIMX vs RNWFX
PIIMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts PIIMX vs RNWFX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
Price$34.73
Change-$0.21 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.7B
American Funds New World R5
Price$96.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
PIIMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIIMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIIMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. PIIMX (4.7B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than PIIMX: RNWFX (0.97) vs PIIMX (0.26). PIIMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: PIIMX (9 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). PIIMX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PIIMX (28.50). PIIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: PIIMX (0) vs RNWFX (250). PIIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.44 vs. RNWFX (12.79). PIIMX return over 5 years is better than : 36.11 vs. RNWFX (30.85).
| PIIMX | RNWFX | PIIMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.62 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.848 | 24.657 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 75.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.97 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.44 | 12.79 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.46 | 57.93 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.11 | 30.85 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement