Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIIMX vs RNWFX
PIIMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts PIIMX vs RNWFX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
Price$33.93
Change+$0.37 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.07B
American Funds New World R5
Price$95.43
Change+$0.60 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
PIIMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIIMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIIMX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. PIIMX (4.07B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than PIIMX: RNWFX (1.01) vs PIIMX (0.27). PIIMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: PIIMX (9 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). PIIMX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PIIMX (28.50). PIIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: PIIMX (0) vs RNWFX (250). PIIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.36 vs. RNWFX (17.49). PIIMX (32.60) and RNWFX (31.46) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PIIMX | RNWFX | PIIMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.62 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.482 | 23.518 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.07B | 74.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.01 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.36 | 17.49 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.07 | 50.22 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.60 | 31.46 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement