Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIIMX vs RNWFX
PIIMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts PIIMX vs RNWFX
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
Price$30.72
Change+$0.19 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.04B
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.05
Change+$0.56 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
PIIMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIIMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIIMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. PIIMX (3.05B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than PIIMX: RNWFX (1.04) vs PIIMX (0.29). PIIMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: PIIMX (9 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). PIIMX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PIIMX (28.50). PIIMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: PIIMX (0) vs RNWFX (250). PIIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. RNWFX (11.83). PIIMX (34.65) and RNWFX (33.20) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PIIMX | RNWFX | PIIMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.62 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.440 | 16.554 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.05B | 70.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.04 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.70 | 11.83 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.84 | 40.39 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.65 | 33.20 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement