Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PISQX vs TRIGX
PISQX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts PISQX vs TRIGX
Columbia Pyrford International Stk Ins 3
Price$15.58
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets300.21M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.07B
PISQX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PISQX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PISQX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.1B vs. PISQX (300M). PISQX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: PISQX (2.96) vs TRIGX (2.04). PISQX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: PISQX (11 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). PISQX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). TRIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.90 vs. PISQX (14.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PISQX: TRIGX (2500) vs PISQX (1000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.63 vs. PISQX (10.68). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 100.34 vs. PISQX (39.18).
| PISQX | TRIGX | PISQX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.87 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.87 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.361 | 29.252 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 16.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.04 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.68 | 27.63 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.05 | 76.59 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.18 | 100.34 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.78 | 79.42 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement