Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PISQX vs TRIGX
PISQX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts PISQX vs TRIGX
Columbia Pyrford International Stk Ins 3
Price$15.03
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.95M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.48
Change-$0.16 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.82B
PISQX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PISQX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PISQX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. PISQX (306M). PISQX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: PISQX (3.10) vs TRIGX (2.21). PISQX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: PISQX (11 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). PISQX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). TRIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.90 vs. PISQX (14.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PISQX: TRIGX (2500) vs PISQX (1000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. PISQX (7.28). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 111.96 vs. PISQX (49.98).
| PISQX | TRIGX | PISQX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.87 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.87 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.492 | 21.483 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 14.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.10 | 2.21 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.28 | 18.61 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.66 | 55.59 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.98 | 111.96 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.80 | 61.83 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers