Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PISQX vs TRIGX
PISQX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts PISQX vs TRIGX
Columbia Pyrford International Stk Ins 3
Price$15.83
Change+$0.11 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.74M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.18B
PISQX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PISQX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PISQX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. PISQX (303M). PISQX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: PISQX (2.89) vs TRIGX (1.96). PISQX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: PISQX (11 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). PISQX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). TRIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.90 vs. PISQX (14.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PISQX: TRIGX (2500) vs PISQX (1000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.97 vs. PISQX (6.19). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 100.87 vs. PISQX (41.44).
| PISQX | TRIGX | PISQX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.87 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.87 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.106 | 31.725 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 16.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 1.96 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.19 | 24.97 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.66 | 89.53 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.44 | 100.87 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.02 | 97.59 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement