It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLAG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RMCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
PLAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -16.90% price change this week, while RMCF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.07%.
PLAG is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2023.
RMCF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2023.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
|PLAG||RMCF||PLAG / RMCF|
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
PRICE GROWTH RATING
P/E GROWTH RATING
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PLAG's Valuation (66) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (78). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (100). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
RMCF's SMR Rating (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PLAG (98). This means that RMCF’s stock grew similarly to PLAG’s over the last 12 months.
PLAG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMCF (78). This means that PLAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
RMCF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLAG (100). This means that RMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLAG’s over the last 12 months.
1 day ago76%
1 day ago69%
1 day ago70%
1 day ago71%
1 day ago69%
18 days ago68%
4 days ago73%
1 day ago60%
1 day ago78%
A.I.dvisor tells us that PLAG and RMCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLAG and RMCF's prices will move in lockstep.