Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PLDR vs SCHG
PLDR vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts PLDR vs SCHG
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
Price$36.04
Change+$0.23 (+0.64%)
Volume$12.04K
Net Assets815.68M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$31.92
Change+$0.18 (+0.57%)
Volume$13.45M
Net Assets50.79B
PLDR vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PLDR vs. SCHG commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLDR is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 50.8B vs. PLDR (816M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than PLDR: SCHG (14.870) vs PLDR (8.090). PLDR was incepted earlier than SCHG: PLDR (4 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than PLDR (0.60). PLDR has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| PLDR | SCHG | PLDR / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 8.090 | 14.870 | 54% |
| Net Assets | 816M | 50.8B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 3.00 | 1,067% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.37 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PLDR | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 16 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PLDR and PLD have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLDR and PLD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLDR | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| PLD - PLDR | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
| BALL - PLDR | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| V - PLDR | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
| AAPL - PLDR | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| LIN - PLDR | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| META - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||