PLFRF
Price
$43.20
Change
-$0.60 (-1.37%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.29B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SHKLY
Price
$146.57
Change
-$1.28 (-0.87%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
8.5B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLFRF vs SHKLY

Header iconPLFRF vs SHKLY Comparison
Open Charts PLFRF vs SHKLYBanner chart's image
Palfinger AG
Price$43.20
Change-$0.60 (-1.37%)
Volume$115
Capitalization1.29B
Sinotruk Hong Kong
Price$146.57
Change-$1.28 (-0.87%)
Volume$500
Capitalization8.5B
PLFRF vs SHKLY Comparison Chart in %
PLFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHKLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLFRF vs. SHKLY commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLFRF is a Hold and SHKLY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (PLFRF: $43.20 vs. SHKLY: $141.82)
Brand notoriety: PLFRF and SHKLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLFRF: 112% vs. SHKLY: 47%
Market capitalization -- PLFRF: $1.29B vs. SHKLY: $8.5B
PLFRF [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $1.29B. SHKLY’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $8.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $246.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $15.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLFRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHKLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PLFRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHKLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHKLY is a better buy in the long-term than PLFRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLFRF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHKLY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLFRF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SHKLY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHKLY is a better buy in the short-term than PLFRF.

Price Growth

PLFRF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHKLY (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+0.03% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHKLY($8.5B) has a higher market cap than PLFRF($1.29B). PLFRF has higher P/E ratio than SHKLY: PLFRF (15.79) vs SHKLY (9.58). PLFRF YTD gains are higher at: 96.380 vs. SHKLY (20.102). SHKLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.72B vs. PLFRF (258M). SHKLY has higher revenues than PLFRF: SHKLY (95.1B) vs PLFRF (2.32B).
PLFRFSHKLYPLFRF / SHKLY
Capitalization1.29B8.5B15%
EBITDA258M9.72B3%
Gain YTD96.38020.102479%
P/E Ratio15.799.58165%
Revenue2.32B95.1B2%
Total Cash57MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLFRF vs SHKLY: Fundamental Ratings
PLFRF
SHKLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8676
SMR RATING
1..100
6526
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
724
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHKLY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as PLFRF (28). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew similarly to PLFRF’s over the last 12 months.

SHKLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as PLFRF (86). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew similarly to PLFRF’s over the last 12 months.

SHKLY's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLFRF (65). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLFRF’s over the last 12 months.

PLFRF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SHKLY (50). This means that PLFRF’s stock grew similarly to SHKLY’s over the last 12 months.

PLFRF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as SHKLY (24). This means that PLFRF’s stock grew similarly to SHKLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLFRFSHKLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
5%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHKLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MINV36.41-0.17
-0.47%
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
DGS56.67-0.32
-0.56%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmCp Div ETF
HGLB10.04-0.09
-0.90%
Highland Global Allocation Fund
BETE70.69-0.99
-1.38%
ProShares Bitcoin & Eth Eq Wgh ETF
QBTX340.22-44.34
-11.53%
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF

SHKLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHKLY and OUKPY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHKLY and OUKPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHKLY
1D Price
Change %
SHKLY100%
N/A
OUKPY - SHKLY
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
SNYYF - SHKLY
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.41%
OUKPF - SHKLY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLFRF - SHKLY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A