PLG
Price
$1.62
Change
+$0.09 (+5.88%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
118.83M
13 days until earnings call
RVSDF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLG vs RVSDF

Header iconPLG vs RVSDF Comparison
Open Charts PLG vs RVSDFBanner chart's image
Platinum Group Metals
Price$1.62
Change+$0.09 (+5.88%)
Volume$3.38M
Capitalization118.83M
Riverside Resources, Inc. New
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$65.21K
Capitalization9.83M
PLG vs RVSDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLG vs. RVSDF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLG is a StrongBuy and RVSDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PLG: $1.62 vs. RVSDF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: PLG and RVSDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLG: 284% vs. RVSDF: 24%
Market capitalization -- PLG: $118.83M vs. RVSDF: $9.83M
PLG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $118.83M. RVSDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $9.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRVSDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RVSDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RVSDF is a better buy in the long-term than PLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PLG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PLG (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.52% price change this week, while RVSDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLG is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

RVSDF is expected to report earnings on May 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLG($119M) has a higher market cap than RVSDF($9.83M). PLG YTD gains are higher at: 26.563 vs. RVSDF (20.267). RVSDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -198.6K vs. PLG (-5.09M). RVSDF has more cash in the bank: 8.72M vs. PLG (7.11M). RVSDF has less debt than PLG: RVSDF (33.6K) vs PLG (302K). PLG (0) and RVSDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PLGRVSDFPLG / RVSDF
Capitalization119M9.83M1,211%
EBITDA-5.09M-198.6K2,562%
Gain YTD26.56320.267131%
P/E RatioN/A13.37-
Revenue00-
Total Cash7.11M8.72M81%
Total Debt302K33.6K899%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLG vs RVSDF: Fundamental Ratings
PLG
RVSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1870
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
9493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
784
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a4

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RVSDF's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as PLG (96) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that RVSDF’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

PLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RVSDF (100) in the null industry. This means that PLG’s stock grew similarly to RVSDF’s over the last 12 months.

RVSDF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as PLG (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that RVSDF’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

PLG's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RVSDF (63) in the null industry. This means that PLG’s stock grew similarly to RVSDF’s over the last 12 months.

RVSDF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLG (78) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that RVSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICPUX6.310.12
+1.87%
Integrity Mid-North American Resources C
ADCYX23.69N/A
N/A
American Century Disciplined Growth Y
VWICX15.17N/A
N/A
Vanguard International Core Stock Inv
GMAOX11.63N/A
N/A
GMO Quality Cyclicals I
JACLX18.34N/A
N/A
JHancock Mid Cap Growth C

RVSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVSDF and NEWP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVSDF and NEWP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVSDF
1D Price
Change %
RVSDF100%
+1.39%
NEWP - RVSDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
CMCL - RVSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
PLG - RVSDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.88%
CNL - RVSDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.40%
CAPTF - RVSDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.10%
More