PLL
Price
$6.42
Change
+$0.19 (+3.05%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
256.53M
69 days until earnings call
PMETF
Price
$1.52
Change
-$0.01 (-0.65%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLL vs PMETF

Header iconPLL vs PMETF Comparison
Open Charts PLL vs PMETFBanner chart's image
Piedmont Lithium
Price$6.42
Change+$0.19 (+3.05%)
Volume$186.42K
Capitalization256.53M
PATRIOT BATTERY METALS
Price$1.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.65%)
Volume$35.25K
Capitalization1.11B
PLL vs PMETF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLL vs. PMETF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLL is a Hold and PMETF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (PLL: $6.42 vs. PMETF: $1.52)
Brand notoriety: PLL and PMETF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLL: 79% vs. PMETF: 122%
Market capitalization -- PLL: $256.53M vs. PMETF: $1.11B
PLL [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $256.53M. PMETF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMETF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMETF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLL is a better buy in the long-term than PMETF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMETF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PMETF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMETF is a better buy in the short-term than PLL.

Price Growth

PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.04% price change this week, while PMETF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.30% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMETF($1.11B) has a higher market cap than PLL($257M). PLL YTD gains are higher at: -26.545 vs. PMETF (-37.740). PMETF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -11.98M vs. PLL (-18.36M). PLL has more cash in the bank: 72.2M vs. PMETF (19.3M). PMETF has less debt than PLL: PMETF (40K) vs PLL (1.57M). PLL has higher revenues than PMETF: PLL (39.8M) vs PMETF (0).
PLLPMETFPLL / PMETF
Capitalization257M1.11B23%
EBITDA-18.36M-11.98M153%
Gain YTD-26.545-37.74070%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue39.8M0-
Total Cash72.2M19.3M374%
Total Debt1.57M40K3,915%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLL vs PMETF: Fundamental Ratings
PLL
PMETF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6052
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9985
SMR RATING
1..100
9288
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9084
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLL's Valuation (28) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMETF (97) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew significantly faster than PMETF’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (99) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (92) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's Price Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (90) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLLPMETF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDGR21.220.71
+3.46%
Schrodinger
MXCT2.250.05
+2.27%
MaxCyte
MIST1.390.01
+0.72%
Milestone Pharmaceuticals
MMYT100.64N/A
N/A
MakeMyTrip Limited
NVO68.17-0.03
-0.04%
Novo-Nordisk A/S

PLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLL
1D Price
Change %
PLL100%
+3.05%
LAC - PLL
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
LAR - PLL
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SGML - PLL
50%
Loosely correlated
+8.20%
FSUGY - PLL
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
GLNCY - PLL
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
More

PMETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMETF has been loosely correlated with PILBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMETF jumps, then PILBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMETF
1D Price
Change %
PMETF100%
-0.72%
PILBF - PMETF
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.73%
PLL - PMETF
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
HBM - PMETF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
LAC - PMETF
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
BHP - PMETF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
More