Advertisement
PLLWF vs RYLPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLLWF is a Hold and RYLPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLLWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRYLPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PLLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RYLPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RYLPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- RYLPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PLLWF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RYLPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -3.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.30%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.81% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| PLLWF | RYLPF | PLLWF / RYLPF | |
| Capitalization | 7.71M | 26.6B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 2.41B | - |
| Gain YTD | -26.667 | 8.277 | -322% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 145.61 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 17.9B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.82B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 8.43B | - |
PLLWF | RYLPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RYLPF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (33). This means that RYLPF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (100). This means that RYLPF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (97). This means that RYLPF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (84). This means that RYLPF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLLWF (100). This means that RYLPF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.
| PLLWF | RYLPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 25% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 23% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 25 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
PLLWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLLWF has been loosely correlated with ACRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLLWF jumps, then ACRS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLLWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLLWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACRS - PLLWF | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| MYNZ - PLLWF | 28% Poorly correlated | +5.49% | ||
| POCI - PLLWF | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
| PCHM - PLLWF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RSCF - PLLWF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.84% | ||
More | ||||
RYLPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RYLPF has been loosely correlated with PHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RYLPF jumps, then PHG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RYLPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYLPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PHG - RYLPF | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| SNNUF - RYLPF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RDGL - RYLPF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| RSCF - RYLPF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.84% | ||
| PLLWF - RYLPF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||