Advertisement
PLNH vs TSNDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLNH is a StrongBuy and TSNDF is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PLNH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSNDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PLNH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TSNDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Reported Earning Dates
TSNDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
| PLNH | TSNDF | PLNH / TSNDF | |
| Capitalization | 78.1M | 161M | 49% |
| EBITDA | -3.71M | 9.91M | -37% |
| Gain YTD | -36.942 | -14.662 | 252% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 55.47 | - |
| Revenue | 122M | 297M | 41% |
| Total Cash | 15.6M | 30.2M | 52% |
| Total Debt | 56.8M | 246M | 23% |
PLNH | TSNDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PLNH's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TSNDF (71). This means that PLNH’s stock grew similarly to TSNDF’s over the last 12 months.
PLNH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TSNDF (100). This means that PLNH’s stock grew similarly to TSNDF’s over the last 12 months.
PLNH's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as TSNDF (97). This means that PLNH’s stock grew similarly to TSNDF’s over the last 12 months.
TSNDF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PLNH (64). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew similarly to PLNH’s over the last 12 months.
TSNDF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLNH (100). This means that TSNDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLNH’s over the last 12 months.
| PLNH | TSNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HFQRX | 6.99 | 0.01 | +0.14% |
| Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N | |||
| SWDSX | 17.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Schwab Dividend Equity | |||
| TSVCX | 10.60 | N/A | N/A |
| Timothy Plan Small Cap Value C | |||
| GOFCX | 27.32 | N/A | N/A |
| Victory Pioneer Select Mid Cap Growth C | |||
| MAECX | 12.24 | -0.03 | -0.24% |
| BlackRock Emerging Markets Ex-Chn Inst | |||
PLNH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLNH has been loosely correlated with CRLBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLNH jumps, then CRLBF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLNH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLNH | 100% | +11.16% | ||
| CRLBF - PLNH | 65% Loosely correlated | +9.79% | ||
| JUSHF - PLNH | 63% Loosely correlated | +7.05% | ||
| TSNDF - PLNH | 61% Loosely correlated | +8.76% | ||
| VRNOF - PLNH | 60% Loosely correlated | +12.95% | ||
| TCNNF - PLNH | 59% Loosely correlated | +5.52% | ||
More | ||||
TSNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSNDF has been closely correlated with GTBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSNDF jumps, then GTBIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSNDF | 100% | +8.76% | ||
| GTBIF - TSNDF | 78% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| CRLBF - TSNDF | 76% Closely correlated | +9.79% | ||
| TCNNF - TSNDF | 76% Closely correlated | +5.52% | ||
| CURLF - TSNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +13.97% | ||
| VRNOF - TSNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +12.95% | ||
More | ||||