PLSDF
Price
$2.00
Change
+$0.03 (+1.52%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
82.4M
PSYTF
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.16 (-1.75%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
799.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLSDF vs PSYTF

Header iconPLSDF vs PSYTF Comparison
Open Charts PLSDF vs PSYTFBanner chart's image
Pulse Seismic
Price$2.00
Change+$0.03 (+1.52%)
Volume$1.81K
Capitalization82.4M
Pason Systems
Price$9.00
Change-$0.16 (-1.75%)
Volume$6.51K
Capitalization799.65M
PLSDF vs PSYTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLSDF vs. PSYTF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLSDF is a Hold and PSYTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PLSDF: $2.00 vs. PSYTF: $9.00)
Brand notoriety: PLSDF and PSYTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLSDF: 14% vs. PSYTF: 3%
Market capitalization -- PLSDF: $82.4M vs. PSYTF: $799.65M
PLSDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $82.4M. PSYTF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $799.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLSDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePSYTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PLSDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSDF is a better buy in the long-term than PSYTF.

Price Growth

PLSDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.71% price change this week, while PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +5.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLSDF is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+5.08% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSYTF($800M) has a higher market cap than PLSDF($82.4M). PLSDF has higher P/E ratio than PSYTF: PLSDF (39.84) vs PSYTF (8.88). PLSDF YTD gains are higher at: 20.482 vs. PSYTF (-4.010). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 168M vs. PLSDF (14.9M). PSYTF has more cash in the bank: 185M vs. PLSDF (9.69M). PLSDF has less debt than PSYTF: PLSDF (327K) vs PSYTF (13.2M). PSYTF has higher revenues than PLSDF: PSYTF (359M) vs PLSDF (21.8M).
PLSDFPSYTFPLSDF / PSYTF
Capitalization82.4M800M10%
EBITDA14.9M168M9%
Gain YTD20.482-4.010-511%
P/E Ratio39.848.88449%
Revenue21.8M359M6%
Total Cash9.69M185M5%
Total Debt327K13.2M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLSDF vs PSYTF: Fundamental Ratings
PLSDF
PSYTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3627
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3353
SMR RATING
1..100
1754
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2819
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSDF (42). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYTF (53). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSYTF (54). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYTF (57). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSDF (28). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMLP3.120.09
+3.14%
Martin Midstream Partners LP
NAMS19.520.13
+0.67%
NewAmsterdam Pharma Company NV
EBF18.530.04
+0.22%
Ennis
WTFCM25.220.01
+0.04%
Wintrust Financial Corp
CZR25.62-0.28
-1.08%
Caesars Entertainment

PLSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSDF and QSEP have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSDF and QSEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSDF
1D Price
Change %
PLSDF100%
+1.52%
QSEP - PLSDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
MCCRF - PLSDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
PDER - PLSDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
PSYTF - PLSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POFCF - PLSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More