PLSDF
Price
$2.99
Change
+$0.04 (+1.36%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
82.4M
PSYTF
Price
$8.54
Change
+$0.21 (+2.52%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
799.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLSDF vs PSYTF

Header iconPLSDF vs PSYTF Comparison
Open Charts PLSDF vs PSYTFBanner chart's image
Pulse Seismic
Price$2.99
Change+$0.04 (+1.36%)
Volume$30.52K
Capitalization82.4M
Pason Systems
Price$8.54
Change+$0.21 (+2.52%)
Volume$9K
Capitalization799.65M
PLSDF vs PSYTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLSDF vs. PSYTF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLSDF is a Buy and PSYTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PLSDF: $2.99 vs. PSYTF: $8.54)
Brand notoriety: PLSDF and PSYTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLSDF: 154% vs. PSYTF: 3%
Market capitalization -- PLSDF: $82.4M vs. PSYTF: $799.65M
PLSDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $82.4M. PSYTF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $799.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLSDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSYTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PLSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSDF is a better buy in the long-term than PSYTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLSDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSYTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLSDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLSDF is a better buy in the short-term than PSYTF.

Price Growth

PLSDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +6.54% price change this week, while PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-1.95% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSYTF($800M) has a higher market cap than PLSDF($82.4M). PLSDF has higher P/E ratio than PSYTF: PLSDF (39.84) vs PSYTF (8.88). PLSDF YTD gains are higher at: 80.416 vs. PSYTF (-8.916). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 168M vs. PLSDF (14.9M). PSYTF has more cash in the bank: 185M vs. PLSDF (9.69M). PLSDF has less debt than PSYTF: PLSDF (327K) vs PSYTF (13.2M). PSYTF has higher revenues than PLSDF: PSYTF (359M) vs PLSDF (21.8M).
PLSDFPSYTFPLSDF / PSYTF
Capitalization82.4M800M10%
EBITDA14.9M168M9%
Gain YTD80.416-8.916-902%
P/E Ratio39.848.88449%
Revenue21.8M359M6%
Total Cash9.69M185M5%
Total Debt327K13.2M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLSDF vs PSYTF: Fundamental Ratings
PLSDF
PSYTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9064
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2160
SMR RATING
1..100
1454
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6832
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSDF (43). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSYTF (60). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSYTF (54). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYTF (62). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLSDF (68). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLSDFPSYTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMEX0.070.03
+64.29%
Northern Minerals & Exploration Ltd.
WYGPY8.160.22
+2.77%
Worley Ltd.
DIMC38.490.15
+0.39%
Dimeco, Inc.
LIFZF19.47-0.16
-0.82%
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
FSUMF12.05-0.10
-0.82%
FORTESCUE LTD.

PLSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSDF and QSEP have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSDF and QSEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSDF
1D Price
Change %
PLSDF100%
+1.42%
QSEP - PLSDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
MCCRF - PLSDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
PDER - PLSDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
PSYTF - PLSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POFCF - PLSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NINE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NINE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
N/A
NINE - PSYTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
PUMP - PSYTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
CLB - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
ACDC - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
XPRO - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
More