PLSQF
Price
$34.15
Change
+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.96B
SPXCF
Price
$12.15
Change
-$0.79 (-6.11%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
13.67B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLSQF vs SPXCF

Header iconPLSQF vs SPXCF Comparison
Open Charts PLSQF vs SPXCFBanner chart's image
Plus500
Price$34.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization2.96B
Singapore Exchange
Price$12.15
Change-$0.79 (-6.11%)
Volume$1.09K
Capitalization13.67B
PLSQF vs SPXCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PLSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLSQF vs. SPXCF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLSQF is a Buy and SPXCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PLSQF: $33.09 vs. SPXCF: $12.15)
Brand notoriety: PLSQF and SPXCF are both not notable
PLSQF represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while SPXCF is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLSQF: 100% vs. SPXCF: 67%
Market capitalization -- PLSQF: $2.96B vs. SPXCF: $13.67B
PLSQF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.96B. SPXCF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $13.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $168.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLSQF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSPXCF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PLSQF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SPXCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PLSQF and SPXCF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLSQF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPXCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLSQF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SPXCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLSQF is a better buy in the short-term than SPXCF.

Price Growth

PLSQF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPXCF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -7.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.80%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.41% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.69% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXCF($13.7B) has a higher market cap than PLSQF($2.96B). SPXCF has higher P/E ratio than PLSQF: SPXCF (25.91) vs PLSQF (9.90). SPXCF YTD gains are higher at: 35.000 vs. PLSQF (8.502). SPXCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 888M vs. PLSQF (350M). PLSQF has less debt than SPXCF: PLSQF (15.8M) vs SPXCF (688M). SPXCF has higher revenues than PLSQF: SPXCF (1.37B) vs PLSQF (728M).
PLSQFSPXCFPLSQF / SPXCF
Capitalization2.96B13.7B22%
EBITDA350M888M39%
Gain YTD8.50235.00024%
P/E Ratio9.9025.9138%
Revenue728M1.37B53%
Total CashN/A1.51B-
Total Debt15.8M688M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLSQF vs SPXCF: Fundamental Ratings
PLSQF
SPXCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4987
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
421
SMR RATING
1..100
2028
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2421
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLSQF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPXCF (63). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCF (21). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to SPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCF (28). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to SPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSQF (55). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew similarly to PLSQF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSQF (24). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew similarly to PLSQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLSQFSPXCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GK25.190.18
+0.71%
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
FIIG21.110.07
+0.33%
First Trust Intermediate DurInvGrdCrpETF
HGER24.700.05
+0.20%
Harbor Commodity All-Weather StrategyETF
AUGP29.890.05
+0.15%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Aug
EFAV85.150.03
+0.04%
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF

PLSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSQF and OTCM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSQF and OTCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSQF
1D Price
Change %
PLSQF100%
N/A
OTCM - PLSQF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
MQBKY - PLSQF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
XAUMF - PLSQF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXCY - PLSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
TMXXF - PLSQF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
More

SPXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPXCF and SPXCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPXCF and SPXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXCF
1D Price
Change %
SPXCF100%
N/A
SPXCY - SPXCF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
OLKR - SPXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+11.79%
QMCI - SPXCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.20%
PLSQF - SPXCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMXXF - SPXCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
More