Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMAQX vs WFDRX
PMAQX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PMAQX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.44
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets892.07M
PMAQX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMAQX vs. WFDRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMAQX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. WFDRX (892M). PMAQX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: PMAQX (0.20) vs WFDRX (0.00). PMAQX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PMAQX (9 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.10 vs. WFDRX (-6.62). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 27.65 vs. WFDRX (-35.34).
| PMAQX | WFDRX | PMAQX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.79 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.82 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.403 | 2.689 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.9B | 892M | 3,464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.10 | -6.62 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 29.27 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.65 | -35.34 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.96 | - |