Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs WFDRX
PMBCX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$33.99
Change+$0.20 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets947.28M
PMBCX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. WFDRX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. WFDRX (947M). PMBCX (0.00) and WFDRX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PMBCX (19 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than WFDRX (0.82). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMBCX: WFDRX (0) vs PMBCX (1000). PMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.65 vs. WFDRX (0.60). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.64 vs. WFDRX (-28.70).
| PMBCX | WFDRX | PMBCX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.79 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.82 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.014 | 6.897 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.2B | 947M | 3,506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.65 | 0.60 | 278% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 40.97 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.64 | -28.70 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.33 | 1.29 | 6,232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement