Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs WFDRX
PMBCX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.44
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets892.33M
PMBCX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. WFDRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. WFDRX (892M). PMBCX (0.00) and WFDRX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PMBCX (19 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than WFDRX (0.82). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMBCX: WFDRX (0) vs PMBCX (1000). PMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.81 vs. WFDRX (-8.23). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.97 vs. WFDRX (-35.89).
| PMBCX | WFDRX | PMBCX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.79 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.82 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.396 | 2.626 | -53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.8B | 892M | 3,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.81 | -8.23 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.92 | 29.19 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.97 | -35.89 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.60 | -2.02 | -3,242% |