Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBJX vs WWNPX
PMBJX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts PMBJX vs WWNPX
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$130.07
Change+$1.04 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
PMBJX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBJX vs. WWNPX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBJX is a Buy and WWNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 31.8B vs. WWNPX (1.23B). WWNPX pays higher dividends than PMBJX: WWNPX (0.07) vs PMBJX (0.06). PMBJX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: PMBJX (24 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). PMBJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. WWNPX (2.00). PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: PMBJX (1000) vs WWNPX (2500). WWNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.86 vs. PMBJX (7.50). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 191.95 vs. PMBJX (49.92).
| PMBJX | WWNPX | PMBJX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.64 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.66 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.778 | -3.623 | -132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.8B | 1.23B | 2,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.07 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 22.86 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.95 | 67.40 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.92 | 191.95 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.03 | 267.94 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement