Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBMX vs SAGCX
PMBMX vs SAGCX Comparison
Open Charts PMBMX vs SAGCX
PMBMX vs SAGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBMX vs. SAGCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBMX is a Buy and SAGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. SAGCX (4.46B). PMBMX pays higher dividends than SAGCX: PMBMX (0.02) vs SAGCX (0.00). PMBMX was incepted earlier than SAGCX: PMBMX (25 years) vs SAGCX (32 years). SAGCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). SAGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SAGCX: PMBMX (0) vs SAGCX (1000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.59 vs. SAGCX (-22.57). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 43.76 vs. SAGCX (-71.12).
| PMBMX | SAGCX | PMBMX / SAGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.85 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.85 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.781 | 12.374 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33B | 4.46B | 739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.59 | -22.57 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.95 | -44.17 | -99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.76 | -71.12 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.62 | -77.81 | -131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement