Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBPX vs RSGFX
PMBPX vs RSGFX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs RSGFX
Victory RS Select Growth C
Price$11.35
Change-$0.13 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.83M
PMBPX vs RSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. RSGFX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a Buy and RSGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. RSGFX (83.8M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than RSGFX: PMBPX (0.01) vs RSGFX (0.00). PMBPX was incepted earlier than RSGFX: PMBPX (25 years) vs RSGFX (18 years). RSGFX (3.68) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). RSGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGFX: PMBPX (0) vs RSGFX (2500). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.08 vs. RSGFX (5.81). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 54.15 vs. RSGFX (-59.96).
| PMBPX | RSGFX | PMBPX / RSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.18 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 3.68 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.397 | -3.691 | -173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3B | 83.8M | 38,544% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.08 | 5.81 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.83 | -18.00 | -282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.15 | -59.96 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.99 | -76.16 | -131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement