Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBPX vs WWNPX
PMBPX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WWNPX
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$119.09
Change-$1.57 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
PMBPX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WWNPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. WWNPX (1.08B). WWNPX pays higher dividends than PMBPX: WWNPX (0.07) vs PMBPX (0.01). PMBPX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: PMBPX (25 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). PMBPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. WWNPX (2.00). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: PMBPX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.30 vs. WWNPX (-26.87). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 151.16 vs. PMBPX (26.58).
| PMBPX | WWNPX | PMBPX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.64 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.66 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.575 | -9.875 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.8B | 1.08B | 2,849% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.07 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.30 | -26.87 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.88 | 14.85 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.58 | 151.16 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.94 | 271.74 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement