PMCOF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
17.46M
PUCCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMCOF vs PUCCF

Header iconPMCOF vs PUCCF Comparison
Open Charts PMCOF vs PUCCFBanner chart's image
PROSPECTOR METALS
Price$0.18
Change+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Volume$63.77K
Capitalization17.46M
CAROLINA RUSH
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization3.62M
PMCOF vs PUCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMCOF vs. PUCCF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMCOF is a Buy and PUCCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PMCOF: $0.18 vs. PUCCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PMCOF and PUCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMCOF: 182% vs. PUCCF: 158%
Market capitalization -- PMCOF: $17.46M vs. PUCCF: $3.62M
PMCOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $17.46M. PUCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMCOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePUCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMCOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PUCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCOF is a better buy in the long-term than PUCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMCOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUCCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMCOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PUCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMCOF is a better buy in the short-term than PUCCF.

Price Growth

PMCOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +11.52% price change this week, while PUCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +29.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3358.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.87% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCOF($17.5M) has a higher market cap than PUCCF($3.63M). PMCOF YTD gains are higher at: 131.336 vs. PUCCF (25.306). PUCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.67M vs. PMCOF (-3.35M). PMCOF has more cash in the bank: 899K vs. PUCCF (681K). PUCCF has higher revenues than PMCOF: PUCCF (3.86K) vs PMCOF (0).
PMCOFPUCCFPMCOF / PUCCF
Capitalization17.5M3.63M483%
EBITDA-3.35M-2.67M125%
Gain YTD131.33625.306519%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue03.86K-
Total Cash899K681K132%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCOF vs PUCCF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCOF
PUCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2127
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PMCOF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUCCF (92). This means that PMCOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that PMCOF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCOF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that PMCOF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCOF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (51). This means that PMCOF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCOF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that PMCOF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMCOFPUCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VYNE0.33N/A
+1.01%
VYNE Therapeutics
OEC10.460.04
+0.38%
Orion SA
PNR109.18-0.16
-0.15%
Pentair plc
IRBT3.59-0.07
-1.91%
iRobot Corp
PSNYW0.29-0.17
-37.23%
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC

PMCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCOF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCOF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCOF
1D Price
Change %
PMCOF100%
+4.37%
GSISF - PMCOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAIFF - PMCOF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.12%
WHGOF - PMCOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.15%
KSTBF - PMCOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUGO - PMCOF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
More

PUCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUCCF and PDIYF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUCCF and PDIYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUCCF
1D Price
Change %
PUCCF100%
N/A
PDIYF - PUCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+9.07%
ONXGF - PUCCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
PMCOF - PUCCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.37%
TINFF - PUCCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRLGF - PUCCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More