PMCOF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
17.43M
WHGOF
Price
$0.39
Change
-$0.01 (-2.50%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMCOF vs WHGOF

Header iconPMCOF vs WHGOF Comparison
Open Charts PMCOF vs WHGOFBanner chart's image
PROSPECTOR METALS
Price$0.17
Change+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Volume$137.02K
Capitalization17.43M
White Gold
Price$0.39
Change-$0.01 (-2.50%)
Volume$112.25K
Capitalization77M
PMCOF vs WHGOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMCOF vs. WHGOF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMCOF is a Buy and WHGOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PMCOF: $0.17 vs. WHGOF: $0.39)
Brand notoriety: PMCOF and WHGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMCOF: 430% vs. WHGOF: 103%
Market capitalization -- PMCOF: $17.43M vs. WHGOF: $77M
PMCOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $17.43M. WHGOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMCOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PMCOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHGOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PMCOF and WHGOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMCOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMCOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WHGOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMCOF is a better buy in the short-term than WHGOF.

Price Growth

PMCOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.21% price change this week, while WHGOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +19.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4166.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGOF($77M) has a higher market cap than PMCOF($17.4M). WHGOF YTD gains are higher at: 145.620 vs. PMCOF (121.648). WHGOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.47M vs. PMCOF (-3.35M). WHGOF has more cash in the bank: 3.53M vs. PMCOF (899K). PMCOF (0) and WHGOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PMCOFWHGOFPMCOF / WHGOF
Capitalization17.4M77M23%
EBITDA-3.35M-2.47M135%
Gain YTD121.648145.62084%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash899K3.53M25%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCOF vs WHGOF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCOF
WHGOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1314
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9892
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3735
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGOF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCOF (48). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to PMCOF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCOF (100). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to PMCOF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCOF (98). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to PMCOF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCOF (37). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to PMCOF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCOF (100). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to PMCOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMCOFWHGOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRE15.340.25
+1.66%
Veris Residential
AAON84.750.06
+0.07%
AAON
ABBV208.06-0.30
-0.14%
ABBVIE
SIF6.73-0.36
-5.08%
SIFCO Industries
TNXP32.18-1.83
-5.38%
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp

PMCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCOF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCOF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCOF
1D Price
Change %
PMCOF100%
+7.25%
GSISF - PMCOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAIFF - PMCOF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
WHGOF - PMCOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
KSTBF - PMCOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUGO - PMCOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
More