PMCUF
Price
$203.50
Change
+$18.10 (+9.76%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
PONGF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.02 (-9.09%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
62.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMCUF vs PONGF

Header iconPMCUF vs PONGF Comparison
Open Charts PMCUF vs PONGFBanner chart's image
Pro Medicus
Price$203.50
Change+$18.10 (+9.76%)
Volume$26
Capitalization4.8B
Atari
Price$0.20
Change-$0.02 (-9.09%)
Volume$14.14K
Capitalization62.76M
PMCUF vs PONGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PONGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMCUF vs. PONGF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMCUF is a Buy and PONGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PMCUF: $203.50 vs. PONGF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: PMCUF and PONGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMCUF: 14% vs. PONGF: 33%
Market capitalization -- PMCUF: $4.8B vs. PONGF: $62.76M
PMCUF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $4.8B. PONGF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $62.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMCUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePONGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PONGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the long-term than PONGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMCUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PONGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMCUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PONGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the short-term than PONGF.

Price Growth

PMCUF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +15.84% price change this week, while PONGF (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCUF($4.8B) has a higher market cap than PONGF($62.8M). PMCUF (140.85) and PONGF (135.14) have similar P/E ratio . PONGF YTD gains are higher at: 73.913 vs. PMCUF (31.062). PMCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 78.6M vs. PONGF (-14.1M). PMCUF has more cash in the bank: 90.6M vs. PONGF (2.6M). PMCUF has less debt than PONGF: PMCUF (2.28M) vs PONGF (4.2M). PMCUF has higher revenues than PONGF: PMCUF (106M) vs PONGF (13.2M).
PMCUFPONGFPMCUF / PONGF
Capitalization4.8B62.8M7,645%
EBITDA78.6M-14.1M-557%
Gain YTD31.06273.91342%
P/E Ratio140.85135.14104%
Revenue106M13.2M803%
Total Cash90.6M2.6M3,485%
Total Debt2.28M4.2M54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCUF vs PONGF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCUF
PONGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
1899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
165
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PMCUF's Valuation (96) in the null industry is in the same range as PONGF (97). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew similarly to PONGF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PONGF (100). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than PONGF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PONGF (99). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than PONGF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as PONGF (37). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew similarly to PONGF’s over the last 12 months.

PONGF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (16). This means that PONGF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMCUFPONGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PONGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KIGRY14.850.54
+3.77%
KION GROUP AG
PGCSF3.15N/A
N/A
Prosegur Cia De Securidad SA
ELDCF0.04N/A
N/A
ELECTRUM DISCOVERY CORP.
ARZGY17.63-0.04
-0.23%
Assicurazioni Generali Spa
CREAF0.61-0.05
-7.32%
Creative Technology Ltd.

PMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCUF and OCLCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCUF and OCLCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCUF
1D Price
Change %
PMCUF100%
+9.76%
OCLCF - PMCUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
TMSNY - PMCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
FSLY - PMCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
NEXXY - PMCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMNSF - PMCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PONGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PONGF and PRYNF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PONGF and PRYNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PONGF
1D Price
Change %
PONGF100%
-9.09%
PRYNF - PONGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OVTZ - PONGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.42%
PBSV - PONGF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCUF - PONGF
5%
Poorly correlated
+9.76%
OTGLY - PONGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More