PMCUF
Price
$194.76
Change
+$4.51 (+2.37%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
20.33B
QTGPF
Price
$54.74
Change
+$1.76 (+3.32%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.38B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMCUF vs QTGPF

Header iconPMCUF vs QTGPF Comparison
Open Charts PMCUF vs QTGPFBanner chart's image
Pro Medicus
Price$194.76
Change+$4.51 (+2.37%)
Volume$35
Capitalization20.33B
QT Group OYJ
Price$54.74
Change+$1.76 (+3.32%)
Volume$25
Capitalization1.38B
PMCUF vs QTGPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMCUF vs. QTGPF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMCUF is a StrongBuy and QTGPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PMCUF: $194.76 vs. QTGPF: $54.74)
Brand notoriety: PMCUF and QTGPF are both not notable
PMCUF represents the Services to the Health Industry, while QTGPF is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMCUF: 15% vs. QTGPF: 246%
Market capitalization -- PMCUF: $20.33B vs. QTGPF: $1.38B
PMCUF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $20.33B. QTGPF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.74B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $309.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMCUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQTGPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QTGPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the long-term than QTGPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMCUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTGPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMCUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QTGPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTGPF is a better buy in the short-term than PMCUF.

Price Growth

PMCUF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -2.50% price change this week, while QTGPF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.21%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.30% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCUF($20.3B) has a higher market cap than QTGPF($1.38B). PMCUF has higher P/E ratio than QTGPF: PMCUF (270.31) vs QTGPF (24.84). PMCUF YTD gains are higher at: 25.433 vs. QTGPF (-21.778). PMCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 165M vs. QTGPF (72.9M). PMCUF has more cash in the bank: 209M vs. QTGPF (91.5M). PMCUF has less debt than QTGPF: PMCUF (2.26M) vs QTGPF (7.53M). PMCUF (213M) and QTGPF (209M) have equivalent revenues.
PMCUFQTGPFPMCUF / QTGPF
Capitalization20.3B1.38B1,473%
EBITDA165M72.9M226%
Gain YTD25.433-21.778-117%
P/E Ratio270.3124.841,088%
Revenue213M209M102%
Total Cash209M91.5M228%
Total Debt2.26M7.53M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCUF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMCUFQTGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLLAX28.510.15
+0.53%
Principal SmallCap A
PAPPX32.030.09
+0.28%
Papp Small & Mid-Cap Growth
CFVLX34.460.03
+0.09%
Commerce Value
OGRIX35.43N/A
N/A
Invesco Comstock Select R6
HGICX50.91-0.13
-0.25%
Hartford Core Equity C

PMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCUF and OCLCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCUF and OCLCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCUF
1D Price
Change %
PMCUF100%
N/A
OCLCF - PMCUF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMSNY - PMCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
-12.27%
FSLY - PMCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
NEXXY - PMCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
TMNSF - PMCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QTGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTGPF has been loosely correlated with NWKLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTGPF jumps, then NWKLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTGPF
1D Price
Change %
QTGPF100%
N/A
NWKLF - QTGPF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WWLNF - QTGPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCUF - QTGPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROIUF - QTGPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROWKF - QTGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+12.50%
More