PMMAF
Price
$27.73
Change
+$0.50 (+1.84%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.08B
27 days until earnings call
SMSEY
Price
$9.56
Change
+$0.11 (+1.16%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMMAF vs SMSEY

Header iconPMMAF vs SMSEY Comparison
Open Charts PMMAF vs SMSEYBanner chart's image
Puma AG Rudolf Dassler Sport
Price$27.73
Change+$0.50 (+1.84%)
Volume$803
Capitalization10.08B
Samsonite Group S.A
Price$9.56
Change+$0.11 (+1.16%)
Volume$4.25K
Capitalization4.28B
PMMAF vs SMSEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMSEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMMAF vs. SMSEY commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMMAF is a Buy and SMSEY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PMMAF: $27.74 vs. SMSEY: $9.56)
Brand notoriety: PMMAF and SMSEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMMAF: 162% vs. SMSEY: 33%
Market capitalization -- PMMAF: $10.08B vs. SMSEY: $4.28B
PMMAF [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $10.08B. SMSEY’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $4.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMMAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PMMAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMSEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PMMAF and SMSEY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMMAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMSEY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMMAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMSEY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMSEY is a better buy in the short-term than PMMAF.

Price Growth

PMMAF (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +6.67% price change this week, while SMSEY (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was +3.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

PMMAF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

SMSEY is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (+4.20% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMMAF($10.1B) has a higher market cap than SMSEY($4.28B). PMMAF has higher P/E ratio than SMSEY: PMMAF (25.91) vs SMSEY (13.37). SMSEY YTD gains are higher at: -26.252 vs. PMMAF (-40.342). PMMAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 655M vs. SMSEY (286M). SMSEY has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. PMMAF (289M). PMMAF has less debt than SMSEY: PMMAF (1.21B) vs SMSEY (3.22B). PMMAF has higher revenues than SMSEY: PMMAF (8.74B) vs SMSEY (2.02B).
PMMAFSMSEYPMMAF / SMSEY
Capitalization10.1B4.28B236%
EBITDA655M286M229%
Gain YTD-40.342-26.252154%
P/E Ratio25.9113.37194%
Revenue8.74B2.02B433%
Total Cash289M1.33B22%
Total Debt1.21B3.22B38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMMAF vs SMSEY: Fundamental Ratings
PMMAF
SMSEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1227
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
7890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8180
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMSEY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as PMMAF (39). This means that SMSEY’s stock grew similarly to PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.

SMSEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as PMMAF (100). This means that SMSEY’s stock grew similarly to PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.

PMMAF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSEY (90). This means that PMMAF’s stock grew similarly to SMSEY’s over the last 12 months.

PMMAF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSEY (63). This means that PMMAF’s stock grew similarly to SMSEY’s over the last 12 months.

SMSEY's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as PMMAF (81). This means that SMSEY’s stock grew similarly to PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMMAFSMSEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMSEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMFAX59.260.38
+0.65%
American Funds American Mutual R1
DIECX44.60N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Core Equity C
SCQGX91.84N/A
N/A
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth S
CCALX74.32N/A
N/A
Conestoga Small Cap Institutional
NOANX34.23N/A
N/A
Natixis Oakmark N

PMMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMMAF has been loosely correlated with PUMSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMMAF jumps, then PUMSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMMAF
1D Price
Change %
PMMAF100%
N/A
PUMSY - PMMAF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
ADDYY - PMMAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
MONRY - PMMAF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
SMSEY - PMMAF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
MONRF - PMMAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMSEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSEY and SMSOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSEY and SMSOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSEY
1D Price
Change %
SMSEY100%
+1.16%
SMSOF - SMSEY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
NKE - SMSEY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCCY - SMSEY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
MONRY - SMSEY
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
MCRAA - SMSEY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More