PMMAF
Price
$24.76
Change
+$0.93 (+3.90%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
3.54B
59 days until earnings call
SMSOF
Price
$2.11
Change
+$0.53 (+33.54%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMMAF vs SMSOF

Header iconPMMAF vs SMSOF Comparison
Open Charts PMMAF vs SMSOFBanner chart's image
Puma AG Rudolf Dassler Sport
Price$24.76
Change+$0.93 (+3.90%)
Volume$1
Capitalization3.54B
SAMSONITE GROUP S A
Price$2.11
Change+$0.53 (+33.54%)
Volume$5.2K
Capitalization3.02B
PMMAF vs SMSOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMSOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMMAF vs. SMSOF commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMMAF is a Buy and SMSOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (PMMAF: $24.76 vs. SMSOF: $2.11)
Brand notoriety: PMMAF and SMSOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMMAF: 0% vs. SMSOF: 86%
Market capitalization -- PMMAF: $3.54B vs. SMSOF: $3.02B
PMMAF [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $3.54B. SMSOF’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $3.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $114.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $8.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMMAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PMMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMSOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMSOF is a better buy in the long-term than PMMAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMMAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMSOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMMAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SMSOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMSOF is a better buy in the short-term than PMMAF.

Price Growth

PMMAF (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а +17.35% price change this week, while SMSOF (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

PMMAF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (+2.09% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMMAF($3.54B) has a higher market cap than SMSOF($3.02B). PMMAF has higher P/E ratio than SMSOF: PMMAF (14.66) vs SMSOF (10.05). SMSOF YTD gains are higher at: -16.528 vs. PMMAF (-46.741). SMSOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 843M vs. PMMAF (377M). SMSOF has more cash in the bank: 658M vs. PMMAF (293M). SMSOF has less debt than PMMAF: SMSOF (2.32B) vs PMMAF (2.58B). PMMAF has higher revenues than SMSOF: PMMAF (8.62B) vs SMSOF (3.59B).
PMMAFSMSOFPMMAF / SMSOF
Capitalization3.54B3.02B117%
EBITDA377M843M45%
Gain YTD-46.741-16.528283%
P/E Ratio14.6610.05146%
Revenue8.62B3.59B240%
Total Cash293M658M45%
Total Debt2.58B2.32B111%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMMAF vs SMSOF: Fundamental Ratings
PMMAF
SMSOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10063
SMR RATING
1..100
9375
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9234
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PMMAF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSOF (34). This means that PMMAF’s stock grew similarly to SMSOF’s over the last 12 months.

SMSOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMMAF (100). This means that SMSOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.

SMSOF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as PMMAF (93). This means that SMSOF’s stock grew similarly to PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.

SMSOF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as PMMAF (63). This means that SMSOF’s stock grew similarly to PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.

SMSOF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMMAF (92). This means that SMSOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMMAFSMSOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
57%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMSOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAYWX25.640.13
+0.51%
Oakmark Global Select Advisor
JORRX20.08-0.09
-0.45%
Janus Henderson Global Select R
MMOJX9.81-0.06
-0.61%
MassMutual Overseas Y
SGZFX62.15-0.67
-1.07%
Saturna Growth Z
HACAX124.56-1.62
-1.28%
Harbor Capital Appreciation Instl

PMMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMMAF has been loosely correlated with PUMSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMMAF jumps, then PUMSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMMAF
1D Price
Change %
PMMAF100%
+3.90%
PUMSY - PMMAF
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.63%
ADDYY - PMMAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
MONRY - PMMAF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
SMSEY - PMMAF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
MONRF - PMMAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMSOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSOF and SMSEY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSOF and SMSEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSOF
1D Price
Change %
SMSOF100%
N/A
SMSEY - SMSOF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
CDGXF - SMSOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MONRY - SMSOF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
PMMAF - SMSOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
MONRF - SMSOF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More