Ad is loading...
PMMCF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
SUIFF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
Ad is loading...

PMMCF vs SUIFF

Header iconPMMCF vs SUIFF Comparison
Open Charts PMMCF vs SUIFFBanner chart's image
Pampa Metals
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Superior Mining International
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$116
CapitalizationN/A
PMMCF vs SUIFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMMCF vs. SUIFF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMMCF is a Hold and SUIFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PMMCF: $0.17 vs. SUIFF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: PMMCF and SUIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMMCF: 1% vs. SUIFF: 5%
Market capitalization -- PMMCF: $1.08M vs. SUIFF: $16.41M
PMMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.08M. SUIFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $16.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSUIFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SUIFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PMMCF and SUIFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

PMMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.26% price change this week, while SUIFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUIFF($16.4M) has a higher market cap than PMMCF($1.08M). PMMCF YTD gains are higher at: 28.208 vs. SUIFF (-32.065). PMMCF (-143.65K) and SUIFF (-147.3K) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . PMMCF has more cash in the bank: 3.48M vs. SUIFF (212K). PMMCF has less debt than SUIFF: PMMCF (10.6K) vs SUIFF (97.6K). PMMCF (0) and SUIFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PMMCFSUIFFPMMCF / SUIFF
Capitalization1.08M16.4M7%
EBITDA-143.65K-147.3K98%
Gain YTD28.208-32.065-88%
P/E RatioN/A80.65-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.48M212K1,643%
Total Debt10.6K97.6K11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUIFF: Fundamental Ratings
SUIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGLJX16.96-0.02
-0.12%
MFS Global Real Estate R1
MLUSX13.31-0.07
-0.52%
MassMutual Mid Cap Value R5
FIJFX98.09-0.72
-0.73%
Fidelity Advisor Materials Z
HOORX32.36-0.33
-1.01%
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps R3
ERASX45.07-0.51
-1.13%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6

PMMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMMCF and PGZFF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMMCF and PGZFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMMCF
1D Price
Change %
PMMCF100%
+3.79%
PGZFF - PMMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.74%
SAMMF - PMMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUIFF - PMMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EEMMF - PMMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.09%
FNICF - PMMCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+13.04%
More

SUIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUIFF and CMDRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUIFF and CMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUIFF
1D Price
Change %
SUIFF100%
N/A
CMDRF - SUIFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCCFF - SUIFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMMCF - SUIFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.79%
NILIF - SUIFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.54%
SRAFF - SUIFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
More