Ad is loading...
PMPCX vs RPMGX
PMPCX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts PMPCX vs RPMGX
Putnam Sustainable Future C
Price$14.78
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets361.17M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$94.54
Change+$0.29 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.97B
PMPCX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMPCX vs. RPMGX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMPCX is a Buy and RPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. PMPCX (361M). PMPCX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMPCX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: PMPCX (24 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). PMPCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). PMPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). PMPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: PMPCX (0) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.08 vs. PMPCX (-14.97). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 9.38 vs. PMPCX (-8.41).
| PMPCX | RPMGX | PMPCX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.75 | 240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.75 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.964 | -5.495 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361M | 27B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.97 | -10.08 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.15 | 5.34 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.41 | 9.38 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.28 | 16.74 | -115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...