PMTYF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
SMNNY
Price
$17.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

PMTYF vs SMNNY

Header iconPMTYF vs SMNNY Comparison
Open Charts PMTYF vs SMNNYBanner chart's image
Playmates Toys
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$26K
CapitalizationN/A
Shimano
Price$17.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$41.37K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
PMTYF vs SMNNY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMNNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
PMTYF vs. SMNNY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMTYF is a Hold and SMNNY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PMTYF: $0.06 vs. SMNNY: $15.96)
Brand notoriety: PMTYF and SMNNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMTYF: 0% vs. SMNNY: 458%
Market capitalization -- PMTYF: $119.55M vs. SMNNY: $13.84B
PMTYF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $119.55M. SMNNY’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $13.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMTYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMNNY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMTYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMNNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMTYF is a better buy in the long-term than SMNNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMNNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMNNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

PMTYF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMNNY (@Recreational Products) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-0.91% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMNNY($13.8B) has a higher market cap than PMTYF($120M). PMTYF has higher P/E ratio than SMNNY: PMTYF (104.17) vs SMNNY (16.45). SMNNY YTD gains are higher at: 3.502 vs. PMTYF (-21.212). SMNNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 164B vs. PMTYF (11.4M). SMNNY has more cash in the bank: 419B vs. PMTYF (973M). PMTYF has less debt than SMNNY: PMTYF (18.1M) vs SMNNY (2.37B). SMNNY has higher revenues than PMTYF: SMNNY (611B) vs PMTYF (679M).
PMTYFSMNNYPMTYF / SMNNY
Capitalization120M13.8B1%
EBITDA11.4M164B0%
Gain YTD-21.2123.502-606%
P/E Ratio104.1716.45633%
Revenue679M611B0%
Total Cash973M419B0%
Total Debt18.1M2.37B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMTYF vs SMNNY: Fundamental Ratings
PMTYF
SMNNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9488
SMR RATING
1..100
8680
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4834
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PMTYF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMNNY (73). This means that PMTYF’s stock grew significantly faster than SMNNY’s over the last 12 months.

SMNNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PMTYF (94). This means that SMNNY’s stock grew similarly to PMTYF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNNY's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as PMTYF (86). This means that SMNNY’s stock grew similarly to PMTYF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNNY's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as PMTYF (83). This means that SMNNY’s stock grew similarly to PMTYF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNNY's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as PMTYF (48). This means that SMNNY’s stock grew similarly to PMTYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMNNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMNNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

PMTYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMTYF and SHMDF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMTYF and SHMDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMTYF
1D Price
Change %
PMTYF100%
N/A
SHMDF - PMTYF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VIVC - PMTYF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNNY - PMTYF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
THUPY - PMTYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNMSF - PMTYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
More

SMNNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMNNY has been loosely correlated with SHMDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMNNY jumps, then SHMDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMNNY
1D Price
Change %
SMNNY100%
-0.50%
SHMDF - SMNNY
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MCFT - SMNNY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
NCBDY - SMNNY
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
LNNGY - SMNNY
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.73%
FNKO - SMNNY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
More