PMYLF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.07 (+87.50%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
SNLGF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

PMYLF vs SNLGF

Header iconPMYLF vs SNLGF Comparison
Open Charts PMYLF vs SNLGFBanner chart's image
Boab Metals
Price$0.15
Change+$0.07 (+87.50%)
Volume$30K
CapitalizationN/A
SAN LORENZO GOLD
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
PMYLF vs SNLGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PMYLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMYLF vs. SNLGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMYLF is a Hold and SNLGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (PMYLF: $0.15 vs. SNLGF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: PMYLF and SNLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMYLF: 122% vs. SNLGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PMYLF: $23.24M vs. SNLGF: $2.87M
PMYLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $23.24M. SNLGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMYLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMYLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PMYLF and SNLGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMYLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PMYLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

PMYLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNLGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMYLF($23.2M) has a higher market cap than SNLGF($2.87M). PMYLF YTD gains are higher at: -21.053 vs. SNLGF (-53.474).
PMYLFSNLGFPMYLF / SNLGF
Capitalization23.2M2.87M809%
EBITDA-4.92MN/A-
Gain YTD-21.053-53.47439%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue132KN/A-
Total Cash2.91MN/A-
Total Debt99.6KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMYLFSNLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PMYLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVRS36.802.16
+6.24%
iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF
JPSE49.17-0.66
-1.32%
JPMorgan Divers Ret US Small Cap Eq ETF
XTWY39.76-0.55
-1.36%
BondBloxx Bloomberg TwentyYrTrgDuUSTrETF
IXJ86.31-1.48
-1.69%
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
MGMT41.44-1.65
-3.82%
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF

PMYLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMYLF has been loosely correlated with SNLGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMYLF jumps, then SNLGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMYLF
1D Price
Change %
PMYLF100%
N/A
SNLGF - PMYLF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WTRNF - PMYLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CVWFF - PMYLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILKAF - PMYLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPQFF - PMYLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
More

SNLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNLGF has been loosely correlated with WTRNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNLGF jumps, then WTRNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNLGF
1D Price
Change %
SNLGF100%
N/A
WTRNF - SNLGF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CVWFF - SNLGF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMYLF - SNLGF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OBRUF - SNLGF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTJHY - SNLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More