Ad is loading...
PMYLF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
WTRNF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

PMYLF vs WTRNF

Header iconPMYLF vs WTRNF Comparison
Open Charts PMYLF vs WTRNFBanner chart's image
Boab Metals
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30K
CapitalizationN/A
Western Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$120
CapitalizationN/A
PMYLF vs WTRNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMYLF vs. WTRNF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMYLF is a Hold and WTRNF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PMYLF: $0.15 vs. WTRNF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: PMYLF and WTRNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMYLF: 234% vs. WTRNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PMYLF: $23.24M vs. WTRNF: $36.05M
PMYLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $23.24M. WTRNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $36.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMYLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTRNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMYLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WTRNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WTRNF is a better buy in the long-term than PMYLF.

Price Growth

PMYLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WTRNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTRNF($36M) has a higher market cap than PMYLF($23.2M). PMYLF YTD gains are higher at: -21.053 vs. WTRNF (-51.500). WTRNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.01M vs. PMYLF (-4.92M). WTRNF has more cash in the bank: 9.93M vs. PMYLF (2.91M). PMYLF has less debt than WTRNF: PMYLF (99.6K) vs WTRNF (90.1M). PMYLF has higher revenues than WTRNF: PMYLF (132K) vs WTRNF (0).
PMYLFWTRNFPMYLF / WTRNF
Capitalization23.2M36M64%
EBITDA-4.92M2.01M-245%
Gain YTD-21.053-51.50041%
P/E RatioN/A19.11-
Revenue132K0-
Total Cash2.91M9.93M29%
Total Debt99.6K90.1M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WTRNF: Fundamental Ratings
WTRNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XBB40.450.01
+0.03%
BondBloxx BB Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF
AVEM60.29-0.04
-0.07%
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
PPIE23.28-0.10
-0.43%
Putnam PanAgora ESG Intl Eq ETF
VOTE68.73-0.89
-1.28%
TCW Transform 500 ETF
TOLL32.65-0.65
-1.95%
Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF

PMYLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMYLF has been loosely correlated with SNLGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMYLF jumps, then SNLGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMYLF
1D Price
Change %
PMYLF100%
N/A
SNLGF - PMYLF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WTRNF - PMYLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CVWFF - PMYLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILKAF - PMYLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-10.60%
HPQFF - PMYLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More

WTRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTRNF has been loosely correlated with SNLGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTRNF jumps, then SNLGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTRNF
1D Price
Change %
WTRNF100%
N/A
SNLGF - WTRNF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMYLF - WTRNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CVWFF - WTRNF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBRUF - WTRNF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILKAF - WTRNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-10.60%
More