PMYLF vs WTRNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMYLF is a Hold and WTRNF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PMYLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTRNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PMYLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WTRNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
WTRNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- WTRNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PMYLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WTRNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| PMYLF | WTRNF | PMYLF / WTRNF | |
| Capitalization | 23.2M | 36M | 64% |
| EBITDA | -4.92M | 2.01M | -245% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 19.11 | - |
| Revenue | 132K | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 2.91M | 9.93M | 29% |
| Total Debt | 99.6K | 90.1M | 0% |
WTRNF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PMYLF | WTRNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 11% | 12 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 11% | 12 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 52% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IGTR | 25.03 | 0.24 | +0.98% |
| Innovator Gradient Tactical Rot Str ETF | |||
| NUBD | 21.73 | 0.15 | +0.70% |
| Nuveen ESG US Aggregate Bond ETF | |||
| IPAC | 60.56 | 0.27 | +0.45% |
| iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | |||
| NUAG | 20.64 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggt Bd ETF | |||
| ION | 26.57 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares S&P Global Cor Btty Mtls ETF | |||
PMYLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMYLF has been loosely correlated with SNLGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMYLF jumps, then SNLGF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PMYLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMYLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SNLGF - PMYLF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| WTRNF - PMYLF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CVWFF - PMYLF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ILKAF - PMYLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| HPQFF - PMYLF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.58% | ||
More | ||||
WTRNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTRNF has been loosely correlated with SNLGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTRNF jumps, then SNLGF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WTRNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTRNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SNLGF - WTRNF | 64% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PMYLF - WTRNF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CVWFF - WTRNF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OBRUF - WTRNF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ILKAF - WTRNF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||