PNCKF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.29M
RCGCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
45.93M
Ad is loading...

PNCKF vs RCGCF

Header iconPNCKF vs RCGCF Comparison
Open Charts PNCKF vs RCGCFBanner chart's image
GALLEON GOLD
Price$0.15
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization20.29M
ROSCAN GOLD
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$82.79K
Capitalization45.93M
PNCKF vs RCGCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PNCKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PNCKF vs. RCGCF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNCKF is a Hold and RCGCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (PNCKF: $0.16 vs. RCGCF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: PNCKF and RCGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PNCKF: 90% vs. RCGCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PNCKF: $20.29M vs. RCGCF: $45.93M
PNCKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $20.29M. RCGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $45.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PNCKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRCGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PNCKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RCGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNCKF is a better buy in the long-term than RCGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PNCKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCGCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PNCKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RCGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RCGCF is a better buy in the short-term than PNCKF.

Price Growth

PNCKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.12% price change this week, while RCGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -24.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCGCF($45.9M) has a higher market cap than PNCKF($20.3M). PNCKF YTD gains are higher at: 30.252 vs. RCGCF (-13.349). PNCKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.26M vs. RCGCF (-6.91M). PNCKF has more cash in the bank: 2.57M vs. RCGCF (115K). RCGCF has less debt than PNCKF: RCGCF (0) vs PNCKF (141K). PNCKF (0) and RCGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PNCKFRCGCFPNCKF / RCGCF
Capitalization20.3M45.9M44%
EBITDA-5.26M-6.91M76%
Gain YTD30.252-13.349-227%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.57M115K2,232%
Total Debt141K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNCKF vs RCGCF: Fundamental Ratings
PNCKF
RCGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4893
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNCKF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCGCF (87). This means that PNCKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNCKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that PNCKF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNCKF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that PNCKF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNCKF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCGCF (93). This means that PNCKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNCKF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that PNCKF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PNCKFRCGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PNCKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETHE29.491.56
+5.59%
Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF
EWG33.150.32
+0.97%
iShares MSCI Germany ETF
TPLE26.700.12
+0.44%
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cp Cr Enh ETF
DJUN43.800.19
+0.44%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bfr ETF Jun
DTRE38.19N/A
N/A
First Trust Alerian Dsrupt Tech RE ETF

PNCKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNCKF and OCANF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNCKF and OCANF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNCKF
1D Price
Change %
PNCKF100%
+2.31%
OCANF - PNCKF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
SAND - PNCKF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
NSUPF - PNCKF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
TFPM - PNCKF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
PAAS - PNCKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

RCGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RCGCF and PNCKF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCGCF and PNCKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCGCF
1D Price
Change %
RCGCF100%
-5.13%
PNCKF - RCGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
AUCCF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
RDUFF - RCGCF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDEXF - RCGCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.94%
More