Ad is loading...
PNOCX vs RGAFX
PNOCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PNOCX vs RGAFX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$79.35
Change+$0.67 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.99B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$66.89
Change-$3.98 (-5.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
PNOCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOCX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. PNOCX (5.99B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: RGAFX (0.66) vs PNOCX (0.03). PNOCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PNOCX (26 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PNOCX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.51 vs. PNOCX (-9.68). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 73.14 vs. PNOCX (30.48).
| PNOCX | RGAFX | PNOCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.34 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.34 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.855 | -4.770 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.99B | 280B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.66 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.68 | 0.51 | -1,884% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.51 | 5.94 | -126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.48 | 73.14 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.30 | 62.64 | 21% |