Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOCX vs RGAFX
PNOCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PNOCX vs RGAFX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$83.33
Change+$0.63 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.16B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$78.60
Change+$0.76 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
PNOCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. PNOCX (6.16B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: RGAFX (0.61) vs PNOCX (0.02). PNOCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PNOCX (26 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PNOCX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.68 vs. PNOCX (-9.27). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.83 vs. PNOCX (5.12).
| PNOCX | RGAFX | PNOCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.34 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.34 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.923 | 5.617 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.16B | 305B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.61 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.27 | 9.68 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.89 | 38.45 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.12 | 46.83 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.29 | 77.53 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement