Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOCX vs RGAGX
PNOCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PNOCX vs RGAGX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$88.10
Change+$0.27 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.39B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.82
Change+$0.14 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
PNOCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. PNOCX (6.39B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: RGAGX (0.60) vs PNOCX (0.02). PNOCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PNOCX (26 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: PNOCX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.63 vs. PNOCX (-7.06). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 38.88 vs. PNOCX (-2.52).
| PNOCX | RGAGX | PNOCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.30 | 540% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.30 | 540% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.099 | 15.117 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.39B | 328B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.60 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.06 | 14.63 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.84 | 53.90 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.52 | 38.88 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.41 | 99.59 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers