Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOCX vs RGAGX
PNOCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PNOCX vs RGAGX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$89.87
Change-$0.21 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.56B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$88.68
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
PNOCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PNOCX (6.56B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: RGAGX (0.59) vs PNOCX (0.02). PNOCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PNOCX (26 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: PNOCX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.03 vs. PNOCX (-5.14). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.46 vs. PNOCX (3.49).
| PNOCX | RGAGX | PNOCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.30 | 540% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.30 | 540% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.494 | 18.954 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.56B | 340B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.59 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.14 | 18.03 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.37 | 64.61 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.49 | 50.46 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.70 | 107.95 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers