Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOPX vs RGAFX
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGAFX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$132.00
Change+$0.89 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$86.38
Change+$0.45 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. PNOPX (6.51B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: RGAFX (0.52) vs PNOPX (0.43). PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). PNOPX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PNOPX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. PNOPX (-2.10). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. PNOPX (15.76).
| PNOPX | RGAFX | PNOPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.34 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.34 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.817 | 16.071 | 49% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.51B | 327B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.52 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.10 | 7.27 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.61 | 63.89 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.76 | 35.66 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.29 | 91.99 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement