Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOPX vs RGAFX
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGAFX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$127.78
Change-$0.23 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.47B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$86.32
Change+$0.21 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. PNOPX (6.47B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: RGAFX (0.55) vs PNOPX (0.46). PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). PNOPX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PNOPX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. PNOPX (0.08). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. PNOPX (18.16).
| PNOPX | RGAFX | PNOPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.34 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.34 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.558 | 15.990 | 29% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.47B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.55 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.08 | 18.84 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.38 | 61.27 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.16 | 43.89 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.04 | 102.47 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement