Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOPX vs RGAFX
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGAFX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$126.85
Change-$0.57 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.47B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$85.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. PNOPX (6.47B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: RGAFX (0.56) vs PNOPX (0.46). PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). PNOPX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PNOPX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. PNOPX (-1.34). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.91 vs. PNOPX (20.24).
| PNOPX | RGAFX | PNOPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.34 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.34 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.076 | 14.472 | 28% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.47B | 329B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.56 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 15.05 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.43 | 43.63 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.24 | 45.91 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.64 | 89.80 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement