Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNORX vs RGACX
PNORX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PNORX vs RGACX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R
Price$123.80
Change+$0.75 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.6B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.09
Change+$0.64 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
PNORX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNORX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNORX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. PNORX (6.6B). PNORX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PNORX (0.25) vs RGACX (0.07). PNORX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PNORX (23 years) vs RGACX (23 years). PNORX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNORX (22.00). PNORX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PNORX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.19 vs. PNORX (-1.56). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.04 vs. PNORX (14.34).
| PNORX | RGACX | PNORX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.94 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.94 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.018 | 19.586 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.6B | 341B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.07 | 356% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.56 | 14.19 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.59 | 74.27 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.34 | 40.04 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.83 | 101.32 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement