Ad is loading...
PNSAX vs WCMLX
PNSAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSAX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth A
Price$65.42
Change+$5.60 (+9.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.6B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.08
Change+$1.06 (+10.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.93M
PNSAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.6B vs. WCMLX (39.9M). PNSAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSAX (27 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PNSAX (1.21). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. PNSAX (40.00). PNSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSAX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.74 vs. WCMLX (-23.04). PNSAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.85 vs. WCMLX (17.47).
| PNSAX | WCMLX | PNSAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.99 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.86 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.657 | -22.084 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.6B | 39.9M | 6,521% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.74 | -23.04 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.70 | -15.01 | -65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.85 | 17.47 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...